As someone involved in the business of supplying equipment, I can say that not all customers are easy to deal with. Some can be extremely unreasonable & make ludicrous demands of you, failing which they either threaten to harm your business on social media or just outright do it.
 
This happened to me last year when a customer got upset with us for an equipment he purchased almost 10 years ago, bought from another vendor before the conception of my company & insists machines like mine should not break down at all. He then highlights another brand unit that he has used for almost 20 years with little issues. Literally overnight, my brand was the talk of the entire industry as this customer is somewhat an infliuencer in my field & there were more than a couple of (potential) customers who sided with his opinion. Good thing is at the end of the day, everything was sorted out.
 
This experience did teach me a few lessons;-
 
1) not all customers are interested to know the other side of the story
2) people who’re not even customers & have no experience with the brand are the most vocal.
3) some customers just wants to see you burn
.
Having been involved in the automotive media world for a few years now, I’ve come across my fair share of owner horror stories that, at first glance implies dishonest & unfair business practices on the part of the vehicle brand. Simply disqualifying warranty coverage without proper explanation and exorbitant repair bills being the most sensational stories that is sure to get the public fired up, with the latest fiasco involving the cost of replacing the lithium-ion battery set to the tune of over RM120k.
The public backlash was understandably extreme with media channels posting the estimate quotation getting tons of views and shares.
But is it that simple? Let’s talk about this.
Any reputable company that holds the market leader position understands that the secret towards building a strong, sustainable business is to deliver consistent positive customer experience.
To this end, we follow one mantra;-

A sale is just the beginning; The real work of ensuring the customer is fully satisfied with our product now begins

The key to sustainability & being the front runner in the marketplace is After Sales

The reason why a lot of companies aren’t market leaders is because the bosses see after-sales as a cost center and does not generate as much income as sales. It’s not that after-sales is not profitable; they just need more time for better ROI. Therefore, these bosses put in place policies that are more favorable to the sales team & with the after-sales team being treated less importantly would behave correspondingly.

In a free market without monopoly, the leader sees every sale as a contract; as long as this individual continues to use his/her product, the company has an obligation to deliver – well, “the Best or Nothing”. Nothing is left to chance as every single aspect of the customer ownership experience is scrutinized and the best practices are curated for the pleasure of seeing customers leave with a contended smile. Today, we’ve even seen some brands offer Good Will warranty – not exactly a factory warranty per se but depending on the case, the principal may subsidize parts or the full expense of the replacement component as a sign of appreciation for a loyal customer who’ve always been going back to their authorized service centres.

 

But what many may not realize is that the contract works both ways.

In order to fulfill their obligations, the customer too must agree to certain conditions to make this partnership work. To ensure that the product continues to function as intended, only authorized personnel who’re properly trained to maintain the product is allowed to service said item. In the case of a vehicle, it’s logical that said vehicle must be returned to an authorized service centre to get the attention as stipulated in the service book. Secondly, no modifications can be done on the vehicle since no one can predict what effect these alternations bring.

These are the two basic things a customer should observe to preserve warranty and it makes perfect sense why it should be so.

The problem is when the customer have a different opinion concerning these two points & follows what “they” think is a reasonable course of action instead of following the terms laid clearly in the warranty booklet. Some do this unwittingly such as missing the periodic services thinking the target mileage for service has not been achieved while others deliberately takes his/her new car to his favorite mechanic outside for servicing from day 1.

And when certain expensive or rare component breaks down, the owner then comes back to the authorized SC ranting about how unfair that he/she needs to pay full price for the item.

 

It is usually at this stage that these customers would try to rile up the public in an attempt to force the principal to act in favor of him/her.

This has happened to me and from what I’ve heard, the viral Mercedes-Benz E300 Bluetec battery replacement quote shares a similar story. As we are unable to trace the estimate bill originator, we cannot conclusively confirm if the owner had, in some way or another done something in his/her 4 years of ownership to jeopardize the vehicle’s warranty & eliminated any possible good will subsidy the brand has to offer. But considering the E300 Bluetec was launched in Jan 2015 with deliveries possibly done a month or two later and the estimate quote was dated in mid February 2019, something must have happened to the warranty which should be intact. Heck, we cannot even be certain if this particular unit is an official import or a grey (parallel) one. All we have is a quote with no background or historical data on this car.

In the spirit of protecting its customer data, Mercedes-Benz Malaysia is unable to provide more details on this case but those of us in this line knows that not everything is as straightforward as we think.

Which brings me to the next point; ever since this fiasco started, there appears to be more trepidation concerning the purchase and use of PHEV cars. From what we’ve seen, most premium brand PHEV battery replacements costs within the region of RM30k to RM60k and it’s those non-plug in types (ie Audi A6 Hybrid, Mercedes-Benz S400h, E300 Bluetec) that costs significantly more to repair.

I echo what every motoring journalists is saying; buying a hybrid does NOT save you money in the long term. Whatever savings you gained from refueling less will be factored into battery replacements that ultimately costs a lot more than the fuel fee you managed to avoid. Some might complain that a PHEV compact luxury brand costs less than RM300k but the battery replacement cost takes up 20%-30% of the vehicle’s value. People forget that the RM300k-with-change is EEV tax exempted, which brings the selling price lower. If we pay for it without EEV incentives, we’re probably see a 10% (or less) part cost.

So recognize that ALL technology WILL fail – it’s just when. Save for it or don’t bother getting a hybrid.

Previous post

The Proton X70 - The Proton True Game Changer

Next post

The BMW 530e M Sport and the New BMW 520i Luxury launched

kensomuse

Though working in a field completely unrelated to the automotive industry, kenso has always had an interest in dabbling into the automotive industry, particularly business related aspects such as sales, marketing, strategic planning, blah blah blah. You can probably find better sources of technical specifications elsewhere if you dig long enough in the internet as this blog talks about the real life ramifications of who, what, where, when and why of the automotive world and focuses on relevant information to potential buyers.

Do like the facebook page "http://www.facebook.com/Kensomuse" to receive updates on new articles or drop by every once in a while and share your rant here. You're always welcome

No Comment

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *